Are you thinking about working with a recruiter or a recruitment agency? Some people may need help deciding whether to use recruiters. Or Is the recruitment agency still useful? In light of the popularity of the internet job boards and social networking sites.
In this day and technology, recruitment agencies are even more important. In reality, recruiters do much more than suggest applicants who appear to match a job description. Here are the top six recruitment agency fallacies that need to be dispelled.
1. Candidates never get calls from employers.
One of the most pervasive misconceptions about employment agencies is that recruiters seldom make necessary calls. This misunderstanding might be caused by the many job applicants they encounter frequently. Like all busy people, recruiters must prioritise those who will produce the best results with their time.
As a result, they frequently call those applicants who they believe are best qualified for the open position. All job searchers should anticipate a response to their application, but if you want to be sure that you are one of the people called for the crucial interview, you need to set yourself apart from the competition.
2. Recruiters are only concerned with candidates.
Many businesses think they can use something other than recruiters because they are more concerned with getting candidates interviews than their qualifications. Recruitment consultants aim to find the right candidate for the job, the organisation, and the culture. Recommending unqualified talent or an employer seeking a highly specific skill set the prospect needs to meet is outside everyone’s best interest.
3. Long-term connections are optional for recruiters.
The idea that recruitment firms need to be more interested in developing long-term partnerships is another misconception about them. Instead, their success depends on their capacity to produce customer recommendations and repeat business. A skilled recruiter cultivates enduring connections and long-lasting relationships.
4. Recruitment firms are overpriced.
Thoughts like “Should I still need to use a recruitment agency despite the high fees?” may make many business owners hesitate. However, it’s crucial to consider the potential costs of forgoing a professional’s services. Finding the proper personnel takes a lot of time and effort, time that you or your HR staff would be better off using to expand your company or manage your workforce.
Making the incorrect recruiting choice can also cost your company more money in the long term. Recruiters can locate the highest-calibre applicants and exclude those who do not meet the criteria since they have the resources, expertise, and—most importantly—the distance from your company.
5. Recruitment firms lack industry knowledge.
Employers might believe that a recruiter needs to be more informed about their sector. They believe the recruiter will need help to locate the ideal employees for their business as a result.
Most recruiters focus on and network in a single area, frequently having worked in that field and having a strong network of brilliant individuals in their pipeline. These recruiters frequently go to organisation meetings and business gatherings.
6. Recruitment firms are no longer necessary.
There is no denying the popularity of social networking sites and online employment boards. You can use these resources to identify qualified individuals. The recruiter’s primary responsibility is finding the ideal candidate for the position instead of finding as many candidates as possible.
Recruiters are experts at selecting the top candidates from a pool of resumes. They know exactly what questions to ask and, more crucially, how to ask them. Once a candidate advances to a face-to-face interview, they know it is important to look beyond experience and skills to determine whether they would be a good cultural fit for the company.
7. The commission paid to recruiters is a portion of the salaries
The truth is that hiring a placement service does not affect a candidate’s pay. It makes sense to assume that you would make more money if your employer recruited you directly instead of through employment outsourcing services, but this is not always the case. Your pay is frequently equal to or higher than what you would have made if you hadn’t used a talent acquisition consultant. Three factors account for this:
- Your terms are based on the salary range of the organisation.
- Most employers prefer to pay more to secure top talent.
- Consultants represent both sides’ interests and are consequently involved in the negotiations.
8. The same job offers are available to candidates as they are to recruiters.
The truth is that recruiters have access to distinctive and frequently limited-time offers. You have most likely encountered advertisements where the employer’s name is not mentioned if you have recruiters in your network. These offers are unique and frequently pertain to positions with high competition or requiring certain abilities. One more justification to avoid sacrificing an attractive career opportunity!
9. Recruitment firms make Only temporary, entry-level, and low-paying opportunities available.
The truth is that agencies frequently provide entry-level and managerial employment, both temporary and permanent, with market-competitive compensation. In some situations, such as those involving first experiences, the need to swiftly establish a new network, or learning a particular talent, choosing fixed-term contracts may be more appropriate. The wage range of the employment outsourcing services and the post to be filled are considered while determining compensation.
Connect with New Beginning Skills Today!
Both job searchers and companies must clarify prevalent misconceptions regarding recruiting firms. The lessons learned from dispelling these fallacies highlight these agencies’ crucial function in matching talent with opportunities. The advantages range from cost-efficiency and industry knowledge to individualised services. People and companies can improve their prospects and employment solutions by differentiating fact from fiction by making informed decisions.